I think we're talking about them talking about it, not actually using it. From there it goes to the photo magazine industry who uses PS to do things CNX cant do like adding text, for example. Possibly there's folks out there not using Nikon cameras?ĬNX is great for photographers to do raw conversions and post processing. CNX will never do that even if it can render a Nikon raw file better than any other product because for example it doesn't do a very good job of Canon raw files. If a tool can do almost everything with almost optimal quality then it is a good candidate for wide adoption, having managed that it tends to gather momentum and traction. That being said it is the industry standardįurthermore Photoshop can be used with any manufacturers RAW format though admittedly edits are not performed on those RAW filesĬNX does not perform the entire gamut of functions available in Photoshop and when it comes to RAW image data it only works with Nikon flavours One of the few functions it can't perform is Focus stacking to display much greater DOF in Close focus shots Photoshop can do almost anything you might contemplate with regard to editing Digital photos. It would be nice to pick up a book or magazine that doesn't sutomatically reference PS whenever describing photo editing. No doubt it's a wonderful tool, but probably beyond the needs, comprehension and budget of most amatures.

Ptlens vs dxo viewpoint